Tag Archive: testing


AdamLanza 150x150 Studying Adam Lanza: Possible Evil Gene?When senseless tragedy strikes, whether it is a natural disaster or an event caused by mankind, it is instinct to search for reasons as to how it happened. Humans feel compelled to understand the processes that lead to these events so that preventative measures can be developed and lives can be saved.

Researchers are asking if it is possible to reduce evil to a genetic code. This process is being further studied to identify an “evil gene” in people like 20 year old, Adam Lanza. He is responsible for shooting his own mother and killing 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut.

Scientific understanding of genetics has come far since Gregor Mendel began working with his pea plants in the 1850s. DNA can be used to map ancestry and as evidence in criminal trials. However, the idea that a gene can be identified to predict and prevent violent crimes is complicated by deeper questions.

Does an Evil Gene Exist?

The existence of a gene that indicates criminally violent tendencies will be difficult to prove—if for no other reason than the small sample size. Thankfully, serial and spree killers make up a very small fraction of the world’s population. If scientists look only at those known to have committed violent crimes instead of conducting random sampling, then they may miss other factors that contribute to the behavior.

AdamLanza2 549x343 custom Studying Adam Lanza: Possible Evil Gene?

If an Evil Gene Exists, How Does it Work?

Scientists already know certain genes increase risk for diseases such as cancer and heart disease. They are also aware that a risk does not equate to a guarantee. A gene which indicates a predisposition to violent behavior might work the same way. It could be a dominant or a recessive trait. It might affect one person more severely than another, causing one person to mercilessly squash every insect they see while another makes headlines for their violent actions. Another possibility is that the gene could be inhibited, or turned off by medication. Identifying the gene, is only the first step of the process. Scientists will need a clear understanding of how it interacts with the rest of the body and whether or not it is a hereditary trait.

If Scientists Discover an Evil Gene, What Can Be Done?

The discovery of a gene that predisposes people to violent behavior could lead to a debate about compulsory screening. It could also add a layer of complexity to legal systems. If the Adam Lanza’s of the world are acting on the whims of a gene, something that cannot be controlled, then punishment for crimes enters the same ethical arena as insanity or intellectual disabilities. Researchers will be called upon to discuss the degree of nature versus nurture when deciding whether or not a violent criminal can be held accountable for their actions.

Incoming search terms:

Violent crimes are among the most horrific events on Earth, but sometimes it gets even worse. The crime itself happens and then another person becomes victim to it. A person’s life can be destroyed or even taken from him or her if authorities accuse and charge the wrong person with the crime. To further compound the tragedy, the families of both the original victim and the person jailed under false accusations may not know that the real criminal is still at large. DNA testing can ultimately prove who is responsible for a given crime investigation.

RandolphA 300x218 Man Found Innocent After DNA Test Randolph Arledge was a victim of a false accusation, charge and conviction. In 1981, Carolyn Armstrong was found dead in Texas from dozens of stab wounds. Randolph was not even 30 years old at the time. Three years later, Randolph was sentenced to 99 years in prison for killing Armstrong. The problem is that he did not do it and there was evidence to prove that fact. He went on to spend 28 years of his 99-year sentence in jail for a crime he did not commit. In February 2013, Arledge was set free. Close to half of his life has been stolen from him, but he got the rest back thanks to modern DNA testing.

When Carolyn Armstrong was found, police also found her car down the road. Her vehicle contained DNA evidence but was useless at the time. Arledge is very lucky that police decided to keep the evidence, since they can usually be discarded in most cases. DNA testing was done more than a decade later and determined that another man was the killer. After a hearing, is when a local judge let Arledge go on bond until the conviction is officially overturned.

When Arledge went to jail, his two children were both under five years old. Currently, they are both adults who grew up without a father. The family is now reunited and Armstrong’s family has the satisfaction of knowing that police definitely have the right man this time. Sadly, that does not get back any of the time Randolph Arledge and his children lost.

It is uncertain just how many people have been incarcerated under wrongful convictions. DNA testing is too late to save hundreds or even thousands of them, but it is not too late to make sure that it happens much less often and never in cases where there is DNA evidence. With reliable companies making it easy for even civilians to get accurate DNA testing, there is no reason police and courts cannot offer the same.

Incoming search terms:

supremecourtemblem Court to Review DNA Collection Law

Like fingerprints, DNA remains unique to each individual and never changes. For this reason, DNA testing serves as an invaluable tool for law enforcement officers and the nation’s courts. Once only obtainable through blood samples, Genetic Testing Laboratories and other facilities now have the ability of extracting DNA from less invasive locations that include hair, skin cells or from the cells obtained by swabbing along the cheeks inside the mouth. In 1994, a Federal law enabled law enforcement to establish a national DNA database on felons. Local, state and federal agencies also submit information that all levels of law enforcement share as a tool for solving crimes. However, court systems remain in disagreement as to the appropriate time law enforcement officers might obtain DNA samples without invading a suspect’s right to privacy. The conflict arose secondary to a Maryland case involving convicted rapist Alonzo King.

Law enforcement arrested King as a rape suspect. The state attempted getting a conviction based on DNA samples obtained when officers arrested King three years prior for assault. King’s attorney argued that the court should not allow the evidence because the action infringed upon the suspect’s Fourth Amendment rights. The court convicted King of rape in 2003. Members of the Maryland Court of Appeals agree that merely arresting someone does not grant law enforcement the right to invade privacy by obtaining a DNA sample. The sample obtained after King’s initial arrest was not required for identification and the process carries a higher degree of personal invasion compared to fingerprinting.

chief justice john roberts Court to Review DNA Collection LawState officials requested Supreme Court ruling on the matter. Law enforcement fear losing a vital crime-fighting tool and do not recognize the difference between obtaining fingerprints or DNA information. Chief Justice Roberts agrees with the current statute arguing that samples obtained from suspects arrested for violent crimes aids law enforcement with unsolved cases. The evidence helps eliminate violent criminals from society. Roberts believes that removing this tool from the hands of law enforcement causes more harm than good. Preventing officers from submitting DNA information into a state database also affects the national database and the opportunity for solving crimes in other states or by the F.B.I. The current Maryland law expires at the closing of 2013. The U.S. Supreme Court will make a final determination on the matter by June 2013.

Private citizens also have the option of submitting samples for DNA testing. Having a personal DNA profile helps track or identify individuals in the event that they become the subject of a missing person’s case because of abduction or natural disaster. Samples sent to GTL for DNA testing also serve as evidence for other legal matters that include paternity suits.

Using samples obtained from a child and a suspected parent, laboratories determine the probability of biological relationship by identifying specific, common markers in the DNA of both individuals. Consumers might also desire knowing the geographical location of ancestral origins, which DNA testing provides. Once costing hundreds of dollars, laboratories now perform modern, private DNA tests that ensure accurate results at a fraction of the cost.

Incoming search terms:

gtl csi effect 300x186 The CSI Effect and Its Negative Impact on DNA Testing Practices We all have our favorite crime shows on television. Whether it’s Crime Scene Investigation, Law & Order, Forensic Files, or NCIS, shows that include the process of forensics tend to draw a high viewership. These crime shows make the viewer wonder whether or not it is possible to commit such crimes and get away with it – and while some viewers may think it’s possible, it’s worth noting that the forensic practices you see in these shows are heavily exaggerated. These ‘fictional’ procedures distort viewers’ perception on the actual practice of forensic science, causing what is known as ‘The CSI Effect.’

What is The CSI Effect?

The CSI Effect, named after the show Crime Scene Investigation, is the idea that your favorite crime shows develop a false perception of how the forensic process works. For instance, in shows such as Law & Order and Crime Scene Investigation, DNA test results only seem to take an hour or a few hours when in reality, it can take days or weeks to get the results back, depending on which DNA testing facility is used. This distorted perception leads jurors to believe that cases are supposed to be handled the same way they view it on television.

What is the problem with The CSI Effect?

The problem is this: Not all viewers know fiction from reality. Most viewers begin watching these crime shows with no education on the forensic process – and since they know nothing about the topic, the ‘Hollywood’ fictional practices they see on these shows start to influence their perceptions.  Why is this a problem? Unfortunately, The CSI Effect contributes to false perceptions and can ultimately lead to a disaster in courtrooms, especially a courtroom where the jurors are heavy CSI and other crime show watchers.

The CSI Effect Case Studies

Here are a few cases that were influenced by The CSI Effect:

Robert Blake

Robert Blake 1 181x219 custom The CSI Effect and Its Negative Impact on DNA Testing Practices Actor Robert Blake was accused of murdering his wife, Bonnie Lee Bakley, in Blake’s car outside of a restaurant in 2001. Although the prosecutor presented over 70 witnesses that testified against Blake, the lack of being able to present clear-cut evidence (as most of the cases in CSI contain) led the jury to acquit Blake of all charges. According to the CBS News article:

It was prosecutor Shellie Samuels’ first loss in 50 murder cases. Though she presented more than 70 witnesses against Blake, she couldn’t show the jury blood evidence, or conclusive gun-shot residue.

Oregon District Attorney, Josh Marquis adds:

Jurors now expect us to have a DNA test for just about every case, they expect us to have the most advanced technology possible, and they expect it to look like it does on television.

 

Marina Calabro

Marina Calabro200 112x181 custom The CSI Effect and Its Negative Impact on DNA Testing Practices Marina Calabro was an elderly woman who was murdered by her nephew and his friends in 2001. The CSI Effect was evident as the suspects were heavy viewers of the crime show Forensic Files. As their infatuation with the show intensified, the boys came to the conclusion that it would be rather easy to commit murder and get away with it. A few days before Christmas, Marina’s nephew, Anthony Calabro, kept watch outside while his friends murdered the 84-year-old using techniques they learned from television. The boys made it look like she fell down the stairs by dragging the body to the stairs and placing a trash bag next to her.

The murder was ruled an accident until one of the boys’ friends went to the police upon hearing the story of how the crime happened.

Jermaine McKinney

mckinne 155x205 custom The CSI Effect and Its Negative Impact on DNA Testing Practices Jermaine McKinney broke into a home and murdered a mother and daughter. As a fan of the show Crime Scene Investigation, McKinney had implemented many tactics he had learned from the show, including using bleach to wipe the blood off of his hands as well as burning the bodies of the victims in the basement. McKinney even covered the inside of his car so that blood wouldn’t get transferred.

Although he was careful in his crime, McKinney had overlooked a few obvious things that his favorite show didn’t teach him.  McKinney was found guilty and received two life sentences.

The CSI Effect can have a negative impact on society’s perceptions. Are you a fan of crime shows? Which one is your favorite? Let us know below.

 

Incoming search terms:

A secret that Oprah’s Mother hid from her for almost 50 years has been exposed and proven to be true. It is finally confirmed, thanks to GTL (Genetic Testing Laboratories), that Oprah has a 47-year-old half sister named Patricia.  Surprisingly, her new found family has only lived only 90 minutes from Oprah’s home in Chigaco this whole time! The results for this “bombshell family secret” that were shown on national TV were courtesy of GTL’s test results.

According to ABC News Oprah was in shock when she found out how close the two had actually lived to each other all this time. “Imagine my shock just a few months ago, at the end of October, when I found out I have another sister living just 90 minutes away,” said Winfrey, 57.

abc oprah sister patricia 110124 main ms Oprahs Family Secret Revealed Thanks to GTL!

"Oprah and her sister reunite!"

Oprah, who is known for her talk show where she reunites families, connects people around the world, gives to numerous charities, and ultimately does well for society received a little surprise herself thanks to Genetic Testing Laboratories. Once Oprah found out the truth about her family and that she did have a sibling that her mother had never told her about there was much rejoicing. The talk show star was reported to have said this, “The Oprah Show has reunited a lot of people – I thought I’d seen it all. But this, my friends, is the miracle of all miracles. This time I’m the one being reunited.” Not only has Oprah gained a half sister, but Patricia’s children, Aquarius and Andre are now part of the family as well.

GTL siblings test has help Oprah expand her family and has brought new people and joy to her life. Now she has much to look forward too when she finally gets acquainted with her new found family!

Incoming search terms: