This morning, Prince William walked down the red carpet in Westminster Abbey to await his beautiful bride Kate Middleton for the much anticipated royal wedding. Standing next to William was Prince Harry who watched proudly as his brother and heir to the throne got hitched.
As the royal brothers stood their side-by-side, it’s hard not to notice the dramatic differences between the two handsome men’s appearances, especially because rumor has it, Harry is not Prince Charles’ son.
Not all siblings resemble each other, but these two look like they’re not even related! Harry, a true red-head with freckles and William a dirty-blonde who’s starting to slightly go bald, have dramatically different features.
In an article from Ian Harperin, reports indicate that Harry is actually the son of the late Princess Diana’s ex-lover, James Hewitt. Just take a look at Hewitt and you can see without a doubt, that Harry is not Charles’ son.
Why the big secret?
The royal family’s name cannot be tarnished, so any individual who threatens the family’s reputation, must be dealt with accordingly (very medieval). Hewitt won’t be hung and quartered for the allegations; however, a source told IUC that Prince Philip has threatened Hewitt’s life, therefore silencing him of any confirmation of his paternal status with Prince Harry.
If it was ever confirmed through DNA paternity testing that Harry was in fact Hewitt’s son and then revealed to the public, Harry would be stripped of his royal title.
Diana and Charles had a rocky marriage. Reports indicate that Diana and James had sexual relations during her marriage with Prince Charles, further indicating that Harry’s birth in 1984 could very well have been the birth of Hewitt’s son.
What are the reactions?
“Bloody hell, Harry should call James his real father,” the relative said. “It’s the biggest lie in Britain since Neville Chamberlain assured the world some seven decades ago that Britain and Germany would never go to war.
What are your thoughts?